Subscribe for legal news in infographics!

Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute (Argument January 10, 2018)

HustedSimpleVersion

This case has been decided. See how it turned out!

Is Ohio kicking people off of federal voting rolls illegally?

Ohio, implementing a voter registration procedure (actually, a voter unregistration procedure), is required to remove people off the rolls if they have moved outside of the voting jurisdiction. In order to determine who has moved, Ohio looks at voter inactivity.

Plaintiffs take issue with Ohio’s use of voter inactivity to remove voters. Federal law says a voter cannot be removed from the voter list “by reason of the person’s failure to vote.” Plaintiffs argue that Ohio – in starting the address change removal process with a list of inactive voters – is violating the law.

Ohio has a strong response because its process seems to align closely with a process that the federal law explicitly permits.

The decision in this case will require detailed analysis of the language of the law.

We made two infographics for you on this case. One is the simple version – seen here.

Complex Version

If you want to get deep into the legal argument, check out the complex version. It walks you through the arguments alongside the text of the law.

 

 

 

 

Other Voting Rights Case Infographics

About the Author

Mariam Morshedi

Mariam Morshedi

Mariam Morshedi is the Founder and Executive Director of Subscript Law. Before starting Subscript Law, she practiced civil rights law for AARP Foundation, where she litigated housing, consumer and disability rights issues.

Share this Article

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email

Share your Thoughts

Interested in becoming a contributor?

We’re on the lookout for lawyers who share our passion for teaching legal issues. Write about the Supreme Court case or legal topic of your expertise. We’ll provide the infographic, and you’ll get the recognition.