Subscribe for legal news in infographics!

China Agritech v. Resh (Decided June 11, 2018)

The Supreme Court describes an order of operations that you won’t learn in algebra class.

China Agritech faced a series of class action litigations, the third of which – brought by Resh – is at issue here. The Supreme Court had to decide if Resh’s case could take advantage of a tolling rule (a rule allowing more time to file a case). Otherwise, the case was filed too late and must be dismissed.

The class actions

The issues behind the three class action cases were all the same. A market research company had reported that the company had made grossly inflated statements of its revenue and value in a public filing. Shareholders can bring lawsuits if they lose money because the company misled them. So several groups of shareholders tried. The first class action didn’t work out, and neither did the second (it’s hard to get class actions off the ground).

So here came the third. But unfortunately the “statute of limitations” had already run out. Resh wanted to file after the time deadline because he said the American Pipe tolling rule applies to his case.

The American Pipe tolling rule

The Supreme Court created the “tolling” rule in a 1974 case, American Pipe and Construction Co. v. Utah. The rule is meant to encourage class actions.

As the infographic explains, the class action mechanism helps courts save time and money. Courts would rather review one big case (a bunch of cases consolidated) on the same issue than 100 small (individual) cases. Class actions save the resources of the courts and of the parties.

So what does the tolling rule do? The American Pipe rule allows additional time for someone to file an individual claim if there is an ongoing class action. By not rushing people with individual claims, the rule encourages them to stick with the class action case and see how it turns out before pursuing their individual claims.

The issue

The American Pipe rule allows people with individual claims to wait, but what about people with other class action claims? Does the rule allow them to wait too (give them the time extension)? That’s what Resh wanted here. Resh argued his class action case also should not be rushed; the American Pipe rule applies to class claims too.

The order of operations

The Supreme Court ruled against Resh. The court said there’s an order of things, when it comes to saving the courts’ resources. The idea is to let the class actions go first. Give them a full shot. That’s why the American Pipe rule lets the individual claims wait. Class claims though – as already said – are supposed to go earlier. So the courts will not encourage class claims to be filed later. The American Pipe rule does not apply to them. Thus, it doesn’t apply to Resh’s case. Resh’s case was filed too late.

China Agritech v. Resh (Decided June 11, 2018)

Share your Thoughts

About the Author

Mariam Morshedi

Mariam Morshedi

Mariam Morshedi is the Founder and Executive Director of Subscript Law. Before starting Subscript Law, she practiced civil rights law for AARP Foundation, where she litigated housing, consumer and disability rights issues.

Share this Article

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email

Latest Articles

Interested in becoming a contributor?

We’re on the lookout for lawyers who share our passion for teaching legal issues. Write about the Supreme Court case or legal topic of your expertise. We’ll provide the infographic, and you’ll get the recognition.