Subscribe for legal news in infographics!

Wilson v. Sellers (Argument October 30, 2017)

This case has been decided!

The Court ruled in favor of Wilson.

Supreme Court Graphic Explainer: Wilson v. Sellers

The Supreme Court will hear this case on the same day as Ayestas v. Davis. Both cases involve individuals sentenced to death claiming their lawyers did not effectively help them avoid the death penalty.

Wilson’s case involves a different procedural issue. Individuals seeking federal court review of habeas corpus claims (like ineffective assistance of counsel), must start in state courts. They must “exhaust” their state court potential before getting federal court review.

Even then, the federal court is going to give substantial weight to the underlying state court decision.

But for Wilson, the underlying state court decision was only one sentence long. How can the federal court review a decision without any discussion? The Supreme Court will clarify what the federal courts should do in this case.

What is a decision “on the merits”?

Click here to check out our explainer on this important legal concept.

The graphic is interactive! Scroll your cursor to see where you can click.

About the Author

Mariam Morshedi

Mariam Morshedi

Mariam Morshedi is the Founder and Executive Director of Subscript Law. Before starting Subscript Law, she practiced civil rights law for AARP Foundation, where she litigated housing, consumer and disability rights issues.

Share this Article

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email

Share your Thoughts

Latest Articles

Interested in becoming a contributor?

We’re on the lookout for lawyers who share our passion for teaching legal issues. Write about the Supreme Court case or legal topic of your expertise. We’ll provide the infographic, and you’ll get the recognition.