Subscribe for legal news in infographics!

SAS Institute v. Iancu (Decision April 24, 2018)

The Patent Review Board cannot pick and choose which claims it wants to address in a patent challenge.

If you want to challenge a patent, you’ll use the inter partes review process. It’s there for parties who believe a certain patent is either not novel or it’s obvious (or both). If that’s the case, the patent shouldn’t exist.

Once you file a claim with the Patent Review Board, the Board can either decide to hear your arguments, or it can reject them.

Is there a middle ground?

In this case, SAS had filed a challenge with the Patent Review Board, and the challenge contained 16 claims (16 different reasons the patent should not exist).

The Board decided it would review a few of SAS’s claims, and it just ignored the others. Can the Board pick and choose like that?

Supreme Court ruling

The Supreme Court ruled no. The Court said that the Board can either review all of the claims or none of them. That’s it. And it based its decision on the plain meaning of the language of the law.

See this same-day important patent ruling

Check out the Court’s decision in Oil States Energy Services v. Greene’s Energy Group. The case brought an issue that could have reshaped patent law, and the Court ruled to keep the status quo.

SAS Institute v. Iancu (Decision April 24, 2018)

Share your Thoughts

About the Author

Mariam Morshedi

Mariam Morshedi

Mariam Morshedi is the Founder and Executive Director of Subscript Law. Before starting Subscript Law, she practiced civil rights law for AARP Foundation, where she litigated housing, consumer and disability rights issues.

Share this Article

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email

Latest Articles

Interested in becoming a contributor?

We’re on the lookout for lawyers who share our passion for teaching legal issues. Write about the Supreme Court case or legal topic of your expertise. We’ll provide the infographic, and you’ll get the recognition.