States cannot require public sector employees to pay union fees.

The California notice requirements affecting women’s health clinics are likely to violate the First Amendment.

Florida’s water rights case against Georgia can continue. It should not be dismissed for “redressability.”

Trump’s third version of the travel ban is not likely to violate federal law or the Constitution. The 9th Circuit’s decision halting the order is reversed.

The Sherman Act does not prohibit the Amex contract with the merchants because Ohio et al. have not shown anticompetitive effects on cardholders.

Only one of the Texas voting districts is an impermissible racial gerrymander.

The Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction and judgeship in the court martial system.

Double Jeopardy (5th Amendment) does not prohibit the second trial against Currier because Currier agreed to split his case into two trials.

WesternGeco can get damages for the profits it lost abroad as a result of ION’s infringement of WesternGeco’s patent.

The government needs a 4th Amendment warrant (with probable cause) to get your cell phone location data.

A notice to appear under the deportation rule must include time and place. Pereira’s notice was inadequate and thus did not end his period of living continuously in the U.S.

Railroad employees will not get taxed on stock compensation.

SEC judges must be formally appointed because they have significant authority.

A state can collect tax on online sales even if the seller does not have a physical presence in the state. An extensive virtual presence is enough.

The lower court justified itself sufficiently in making the sentence adjustment.

The Fifth Circuit used the wrong standard in deciding when to fix a judge’s mistake. It must reconsider Rosales-Mireles’ case.

Lozman still has a retaliatory arrest claim against the City, despite that there was probable cause for his arrest.

The plaintiffs did not show adequate injuries to bring the political gerrymandering case.

The denial of preliminary relief on the political gerrymandering claim stands.

The court was not required to defer to the Chinese government’s brief in interpreting Chinese law.

Minnesota’s ban on political apparel violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment.

The Minnesota law can apply retroactively, so Sveen’s kids will get the life insurance proceeds.

Resh’s class action was not filed on time because the claim is not entitled to the time extension.

Ohio’s voter roll purging process does not violate federal law.

The Supreme Court interprets “based on” in the sentence reduction rule.

Appling can get the law firm debt discharged in bankruptcy because his oral statement was not fraudulent.

Colorado must reconsider Masterpiece Cakeshop’s case because its original ruling expressed hostility towards religion, violating the First Amendment.

The Supreme Court interpreted the victims compensation law narrowly, ruling for Lagos.

A parked auto in a driveway is part of a house. Police need a warrant to search it.

The case returns to the lower court to consider a new question.

Employees can sign away their rights to bring class actions against their employers.

The wiretap order was not “facially insufficient,” so Dahda cannot get the communications suppressed.

The case became “moot” when the challengers no longer faced pre-conviction shackling.

A person can have 4th Amendment privacy against police search when driving a rental car, even if the person is not listed on the car lease.

The lawyer cannot overrule a client’s choice to plead innocent.

States can legalize sports betting. The federal law prohibiting it is unconstitutional.

If the Patent Review Board starts a patent review, it must address all of the patent challenger’s claims.

Patent rights can be reviewed in executive branch courts.

Foreign corporations can’t be sued under the Alien Tort Statute.

A federal habeas reviewing court should “look through” an unreasoned state court decision to find the rationale.

Dimaya cannot be deported based on the INA’s definition of “crime of violence” because the definition is too vague.